Case v. Yazoo &. M. V. R.

74 So. 773, 114 Miss. 21
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 74 So. 773 (Case v. Yazoo &. M. V. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Case v. Yazoo &. M. V. R., 74 So. 773, 114 Miss. 21 (Mich. 1917).

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The verdict rendered by the jury is grossly excessive, and the court below should have set it aside and [25]*25awarded a new trial unless a proper remittitur was entered.

But the judge thereof was without power to reduce the damages awarded to such an amount as in his opinion was proper, and without the plaintiff’s consent to enter a judgment therefor. The judgment of the court below will be reversed, and, entering here the judgment which should have been entered there, the verdict will he set aside, and the cause remanded for a new trial, unless a remittitur of six hundred and fifty dollars is entered hv appellant, in which event judgment will he entered here for her in the sum of one hundred dollars.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Capital Transport Co. v. Segrest
181 So. 2d 111 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
Brabham v. Mississippi ex rel. Smith
97 F.2d 251 (Fifth Circuit, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 So. 773, 114 Miss. 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/case-v-yazoo-m-v-r-miss-1917.