Case v. Panzarella
27 Misc. 2d 854, 35 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1942 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1236
Opinions
The order of payment to the intervenor-respondent is void as against the judgment creditor, as it was not filed until after the service of the third-party subpoena. (McCorkle v. [855] Herrman, 117 N. Y. 297; Hoboken Wood Flooring Corp. v. Charles B. Saxon, Inc., 9 N. Y. S. 2d 917.)
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Case v. Panzarella, 27 Misc. 2d 854, 35 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1942 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1236 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
27 Misc. 2d 854 (Case v. Panzarella) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aquilino v. United States
176 N.E.2d 826 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)