Case v. Narrow
This text of 8 Mass. L. Rptr. 545 (Case v. Narrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After hearing, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied.
Atlantic Savings Bank v. Metropolitan Bank, 9 Mass.App.Ct. 286 (1980), holds that a subsequent mortgage subordinates a prior homestead to the mortgage lien, id., 288, but does not hold that such a mortgage extinguishes the homestead as to all subsequent creditors. M.G.L.c. 188, §7 provides that “an estate of homestead created under §2 may be terminated during a lifetime of the owner by either of the following methods: — (1) a deed conveying the properly in which an estate of homestead exists ... which does not specifically reserve said estate of homestead; or by (2) a release of the estate of the homestead ...” The statute does not, however, state that a mortgage is to be deemed the equivalent of “a deed,” for this purpose.
To construe this language to extinguish a homestead vis a vis other than the mortgagee would effectively eliminate homestead protection as to all other subsequent creditors each time a homeowner refinanced or otherwise gave a mortgage on property. It is not reasonable to conclude that the legislature, by enacting Chapter 188, §7, intended such a drastic result, and Atlantic Savings Bank does not so hold.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Mass. L. Rptr. 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/case-v-narrow-masssuperct-1998.