Case v. Indian Motocycle Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Case v. Indian Motocycle Co.

275 A.D.2d 698

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 698 (Case v. Indian Motocycle Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Case v. Indian Motocycle Co., 275 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse the orders appealed from and grant the motion to strike from the complaint all reference to the representative character of the action and to require the plaintiffs to servé an amended complaint separately stating and numbering each individual cause of action upon the ground that the plaintiffs do not show sufficient unity of interest to warrant the maintenance of a representative action. [See post, p. 768.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse the orders appealed from and grant the motion to strike from the complaint all reference to the representative character of the action and to require the plaintiffs to servé an amended complaint separately stating and numbering each individual cause of action upon the ground that the plaintiffs do not show sufficient unity of interest to warrant the maintenance of a representative action. [See post, p. 768.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/case-v-indian-motocycle-co-nyappdiv-1949.