Case v. Fuldner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Case v. Fuldner

86 N.W. 163, 110 Wis. 568, 1901 Wisc. LEXIS 232

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedMay 21, 1901

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 86 N.W. 163 (Case v. Fuldner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Case v. Fuldner, 86 N.W. 163, 110 Wis. 568, 1901 Wisc. LEXIS 232 (Wis. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

MaRshall, J.

The question presented for decision is ruled in favor of appellant by sec. 2686, Stats. 1898. Curtis v. Moore, 15 Wis. 134; Bishop v. Aldrich, 48 Wis. 619, 623; Schoenleber v. Burkhardt, 94 Wis. 575; Schroeder v. Richardson, 101 Wis. 529; State ex rel. Rice v. Chittenden, 107 Wis. 354. The statute cited plainly indicates that special costs against a losing party, upon the decision of a demurrer, or any costs other than such as abide the final result of the action and to be taxed in the ordinary fee bill, are only admissible as terms of leave to interpose some further plea. This court has repeatedly so held in the cases cited. The appeal from the order being general, and no question being raised but that it was proper except as to the costs, it must be reversed as to that feature and otherwise be affirmed.

By the Court.— So ordered. Ordered further that costs in this court in favor of appellant be limited to clerk’s fees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MaRshall, J.

The question presented for decision is ruled in favor of appellant by sec. 2686, Stats. 1898. Curtis v. Moore, 15 Wis. 134; Bishop v. Aldrich, 48 Wis. 619, 623; Schoenleber v. Burkhardt, 94 Wis. 575; Schroeder v. Richardson, 101 Wis. 529; State ex rel. Rice v. Chittenden, 107 Wis. 354. The statute cited plainly indicates that special costs against a losing party, upon the decision of a demurrer, or any costs other than such as abide the final result of the action and to be taxed in the ordinary fee bill, are only admissible as terms of leave to interpose some further plea. This court has repeatedly so held in the cases cited. The appeal from the order being general, and no question being raised but that it was proper except as to the costs, it must be reversed as to that feature and otherwise be affirmed.

By the Court.— So ordered. Ordered further that costs in this court in favor of appellant be limited to clerk’s fees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 N.W. 163, 110 Wis. 568, 1901 Wisc. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/case-v-fuldner-wis-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack