Case v. Connecticut Company

83 A. 1022, 85 Conn. 711, 1912 Conn. LEXIS 199
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 19, 1912·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence so clearly failed to show that the injury complained of was caused by the defendant’s negligence, and that the plaintiffs’ own negligence was not a proximate cause of it, that there was no error in setting the verdict aside.

There is no error.

From this opinion George W. Wheeler, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case v. Connecticut Company, 83 A. 1022, 85 Conn. 711, 1912 Conn. LEXIS 199 (Colo. 1912).

83 A. 1022 (Case v. Connecticut Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cables v. Bristol Water Co.
84 A. 928 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1912)