Case v. Case

3 Pa. D. & C. 518, 1922 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 17
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County
DecidedSeptember 18, 1922
DocketNo. 88
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Pa. D. & C. 518 (Case v. Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Case v. Case, 3 Pa. D. & C. 518, 1922 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 17 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922).

Opinion

Reno, J.,

If ever a man deserved a divorce, the libellant is that man. Unfortunately, his libel was verified before a notary public in Northampton County. There are so many cases holding that libels must be verified before notaries resident in that county in which the libel is exhibited that it would be a vain display of learning to cite them. But there is also abundant and respectable authority for their amendment (cf. Reeves v. Reeves, 3 W. N. C. 558), and we have concluded to permit libellant to do so in this case.

Now, Sept. 18, 1922, upon amendment of libel by verification before a notary of Lehigh County nunc pro tunc, leave for which is hereby granted, decree in divorce is entered.

Prom James E. Schaadt, Allentown, Pa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Pa. D. & C. 518, 1922 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/case-v-case-pactcompllehigh-1922.