Case v. Case

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Case v. Case

255 A.D. 940, 8 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5915

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 940 (Case v. Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Case v. Case, 255 A.D. 940, 8 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted except as to those parts of the paragraph in the answer numbered fourth, occurring before the words “ that in June, 1935, defendant came to a point,” and also except those parts of the first and second sentences in the paragraph in the answer numbered fifth occurring before the words in the respective sentences “ as appears from the proceedings of the Children’s Court,” and otherwise denied, without costs. Memorandum: In our opinion the orders of the Children’s Court of Oneida county are in no wise res adjudícala and allegations in conflict with this view must, therefore, be stricken out. While the other allegations in the answer, particularly those in paragraph 4, which are sought to be stricken out, are matters admissible under the general denial, still they are of the same general character as other allegations in the paragraph to which the plaintiff addresses no motion. We, therefore, conclude that these allegations may remain in the pleading. All concur. (The order denies a motion to strike out allegations in defendant’s answer, in an action for separation.) Present ■ — ■ Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted except as to those parts of the paragraph in the answer numbered fourth, occurring before the words “ that in June, 1935, defendant came to a point,” and also except those parts of the first and second sentences in the paragraph in the answer numbered fifth occurring before the words in the respective sentences “ as appears from the proceedings of the Children’s Court,” and otherwise denied, without costs. Memorandum: In our opinion the orders of the Children’s Court of Oneida county are in no wise res adjudícala and allegations in conflict with this view must, therefore, be stricken out. While the other allegations in the answer, particularly those in paragraph 4, which are sought to be stricken out, are matters admissible under the general denial, still they are of the same general character as other allegations in the paragraph to which the plaintiff addresses no motion. We, therefore, conclude that these allegations may remain in the pleading. All concur. (The order denies a motion to strike out allegations in defendant’s answer, in an action for separation.) Present ■ — ■ Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 940, 8 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/case-v-case-nyappdiv-1938.