Case v. Brotherton
31 S.E. 174, 105 Ga. 510, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 650
This text of 31 S.E. 174 (Case v. Brotherton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Case v. Brotherton, 31 S.E. 174, 105 Ga. 510, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 650 (Ga. 1898).
Opinion
When the recitals of fact contained in a bill of exceptions are so qualified by marginal notes entered thereon by the judge-that this court is unable to know with certainty what occurred at the-trial; and when, moreover, there is in the bill of exceptions no assignment of error upon any ruling or decision of the trial court, the writ of. error will be dismissed.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ocean Steamship Co. v. Blumberg & Sons
86 S.E. 1070 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Winn v. State
53 S.E. 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Bond v. Winn
38 S.E. 328 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
31 S.E. 174, 105 Ga. 510, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/case-v-brotherton-ga-1898.