Case v. Brotherton
31 S.E. 174, 105 Ga. 510, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 650
Opinion
When the recitals of fact contained in a bill of exceptions are so qualified by marginal notes entered thereon by the judge-that this court is unable to know with certainty what occurred at the-trial; and when, moreover, there is in the bill of exceptions no assignment of error upon any ruling or decision of the trial court, the writ of. error will be dismissed.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Case v. Brotherton, 31 S.E. 174, 105 Ga. 510, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 650 (Ga. 1898).
31 S.E. 174 (Case v. Brotherton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ocean Steamship Co. v. Blumberg & Sons
86 S.E. 1070 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Winn v. State
53 S.E. 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Bond v. Winn
38 S.E. 328 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)