Case of White

1 Armstrong. Election Cases 31
CourtNew York State Assembly
DecidedJanuary 28, 1814
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Armstrong. Election Cases 31 (Case of White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York State Assembly primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Case of White, 1 Armstrong. Election Cases 31 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).

Opinion

Report oe Committee.

February lOi% 1814.

Mr. Van Rensselaer, from the committee of privileges and elections, to whom was referred the petition of John White, and the documents accompanying the same, praying that he may be permitted to take his seat as a member of this House, reported:

That it appears by the affidavits of John McDonald, one of the inspectors of the election of the town of Athol, in the county of Warren, Benoni Aldrich, Stephen Moon, James Dow and Stoakes Potter, that Duncan Cameron, John McDonald, John Cameron, Holden Ilenyon and William Johnson wore the inspectors of the last anniversary election in the said town ; that the latter attended only the first day; that the said Duncan Cameron, John McDonald and John Cameron did not vote at 'the said election, because, as they believe, they were severally aliens, and that "the said board did decide that working on the highway alone was a sufficient qualification to entitle a man to vote, and that they did receive votes according to that decision. It further appears by the affidavit of the said John McDonald, that he was an alien, and that Duncan Cameron declared [32]*32in bis bearing, “ tbat be could not take tbe oath if challenged.” By tlie affidavits of John Murray and James Cameron, it appears tbat tbe four first named inspectors acted as such on tbe last day of election, and tbat Duncan Cameron, John McDonald and John Cameron did not vote at that election, believing themselves aliens,. as they severally declared in tbe hearing of the deponents tbat they were born in Europe, and James Cameron knows tbat John Cameron was born in Europe.

By tbe affidavit of Benoni Aldrich, it further appears that tbe said inspectors refused to administer tbe oaths, prescribed by law, to one William. Scripture, who was challenged by a person duly qualified to vote at tbe said election, declaring tbat they bad decided that working on tbe highway alone constituted a qualification to vote, and that if there was ever so much challenging, if they knew of any body being taxed or working on the highway, he should vote without being sworn, declaring tbat the board would be their own judges. It .is proved, by the certificates of John Beebe, cleric of the county of Warren, tbat the said Duncan Cameron and John McDonald were naturalized at a court of common pleas, held in and for the said county, on September 14th last. It also appeared on the examination of John. McDonald, who was one of the inspectors of the town of Athol, that he was born in Scotland, came to this country about the year 1714 or 1775, with the family of his father, being then an infant, and settled in the county of Delaware; that his father shortly after (about the commencement of the revolutionary war), left his family and went to Canada, where he remained the greater part of the war.

The board of inspectors decided that a mere residence for six months within the town, and working on highways within the county, were sufficient qualifications to entitle persons to vote, and that one or more persons were on such qualification allowed to vote. It further appeared by the examination of Duncan Cameron, also one of the inspectors of the town of Athol, that he emigrated to this State from the place of his nativity, North Britain, in the year 1785, and was naturalized in September last; was about ten years old at the time of his arrival here; does not know that his father was ever naturalized ; confirms the testimony of John W. McDonald, and adds, that no .person who had been challenged was permitted to vote by them, without being sworn, or the challenge, withdrawn. It further appeared from the examination of John McDonald, one of the inspectors of the town of Athol, that he was born in Scotland; that he emigrated to [33]*33this country in 1785, and was naturalized in the month of January last past; he confirms the statement of the two last preceding witnesses, as to the decision of the board in regard to the qualification of voters.

It is proved to your committee, by Archibald Noble, of Johns-burgh, in the said county -of Warren, that John Richards, Henry Allen, Wm. Leach, Norris Hopkins and himself, were the inspectors of the election in the said town in April last, and that he himself was an alien, having been born in Ireland, and from his’ testimony and the certificate of the aforesaid John Beebe, it is further proved that he has since been naturalized, and from the testimony of Morris Hopkins, one of the said inspectors of the said election, it-appears that he was not a freeholder, as the only real estate he possessed or held, either in his own or his wife’s right, was under a lease' of twenty-one years, with a covenant that if the consideration money was paid within that period, he should be entitled to a conveyance in fee, and by the affidavit of Henry Allen* another of the said inspectors, it appears that he owns a freehold in the town of Bethlehem, in the county of Albany, and possesses a farm in Johnsburgh, under a lease granted by John Thurman, for twenty years, with liberty to purchase the fee within that time.

It was further proved, on the examination of John Morse, one of the inspectors of the town of Kingsbury, that shortly after the last annual meeting the inspectors of that town met and agreed that the poll should be held on the first day of the then ensuing anniversary election for members of Assembly, and the other officers then to be elected, at .the dwelling-house of the widow Clark, on the second day thereof at William Colvin’s, and on the third or last day at Alpheus Doty’s, and they then authorized Nathaniel Pitcher, also one of the inspectors, to put up the notices pursuant to such determination, which was accordingly done, as he afterwards saw one of them ; that the election was not held on the said first day at the dwelling-house of the said widow Clark, but was opened 'at the house of John Stewart, at a distance of between a half and three-quarters of a mile from her residence, that he never knew of any second or other meeting of the said inspectors for the purpose of altering the notice first published, nor did he, to the best of his knowledge, consent to the alteration of the place, nor know that it was to happen till on the first day of the election; that he lives near the said Pitcher, in the village of Sandy Hill. This witness added that, in his opinion, the [34]*34place of bolding the election on the first day produced no difference in the result of the election of that town, and said that the change of place was owing to sickness in Mrs. Clark’s family.

It appears, from the affidavits of several persons, that the said election was advertised by the inspectors thereof to be held on the first day at the widow Clark’s, but'that it was not there held, but at the house of John Stewart; and William Colvin, one of the inspectors, swears that the reason of not opening the poll at the house of widow Clark was the sickness of some of the family, and the notices first up were not altered, nor were any new notices put up altering the place of holding the election on the first day, nor were the old ones altered, according to the knowledge or belief of the deponent, and that the notice put up at the house of William Colvin, one of the inspectors, was not altered. Arad. Sprague swears that the facts stated by William Colvin are true to his belief.

By the affidavit of Nathaniel Pitphcr it appears that the notices were prepared and put up as sworn to by the other witnesses, that the poll was not held at Mrs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Armstrong. Election Cases 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/case-of-white-nystateassembly-1814.