Case of the Germantown & Perkiomen Turnpike Road Co.

4 Rawle 191, 1833 Pa. LEXIS 21
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 15, 1833·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

The quarter sessions very properly quashed the report, inasmuch as the viewers had not power to report conditionally,or, as in the case of a special verdict, to reserve the matters of law for the determination of the court. They were bound to dispose, in the first instance, of all the matters committed to them, whether constituted of law or of fact, subject however to review by the sessions. It would be improper to anticipate a question which may arise hereafter, whether the rights of the company have been assumed by the district, or whether the corporate owner of a franchise, is a subject for compensation under the general road law. That question may come up on another report, and we restrict ourselves to the ground on which the judgment of the court is clearly sustainable.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case of the Germantown & Perkiomen Turnpike Road Co., 4 Rawle 191, 1833 Pa. LEXIS 21 (Pa. 1833).

4 Rawle 191 (Case of the Germantown & Perkiomen Turnpike Road Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gardner v. Allegheny County
142 A.2d 187 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1958)
Grubb v. Commonwealth
47 Pa. D. & C. 651 (Montgomery County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1943)