Case of Pettit
19 F. Cas. 395
Opinion
Admiralty — Libelant’s Costs — Misconduct of Defendant.
[Cited in Dunlap, Adm. Prac. 102; 2 Pars'. Shipp. & Adm. 479, to the point that costs will be decreed to a libelant though no debt is recovered, where he was misled into bringing suit by the misconduct of defendant. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Case of Pettit, 19 F. Cas. 395 (D. Mass. 1868).
19 F. Cas. 395 (Case of Pettit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The Catherine M. Monahan
197 F. 855 (D. Maryland, 1912)