Case of Peters

2 Johns. Cas. 344
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1801
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 344 (Case of Peters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Case of Peters, 2 Johns. Cas. 344 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1801).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Brothertown Indians are not a distinct nation or tribe. They came from New England, and settled under the jurisdiction of this state. They have never claimed or exercised any criminal jurisdiction among themselves. What civil jurisdiction they exercise, is under the several acts of the legislature which have been made for their civil government; and they have never been considered or treated as an independent tribe. They are not, in this respect, like some of the Indian tribes within this state, whose situation is peculiar, and who, as to offences committed by the individuals within their tribes against each other, have *claimed and exercised a criminal jurisdiction. But without giving any opinion what would be the case with respect to other Indians, we think that the Brothertown Indians are clearly subject to our laws, and to the jurisdiction of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Ray v. Martin
60 N.E.2d 541 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)
United States v. Sa-Coo-Da-Cot
27 F. Cas. 923 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. Cas. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/case-of-peters-nysupct-1801.