Case of Montgomery

841 F.2d 1123, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2148, 1988 WL 16911
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 1988
Docket86-7289
StatusUnpublished

This text of 841 F.2d 1123 (Case of Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Case of Montgomery, 841 F.2d 1123, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2148, 1988 WL 16911 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

841 F.2d 1123
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In the Case of Jerry W. MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff.
Joseph WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
Stephen H. SACHS, Attorney General of Maryland; Howard N.
Lyles, Warden, Marland Penitentiary; Bernard D. Smith,
Assistant Warden; Arnold Hopkins, Commissioner; Clarence
J. Guenze, Commissioner; William Anderson; Sgt. Hands;
Peguese; Brown; Shahinian; Lt. Thomas, Defendants-Appellees,
George H. Collins, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary; Robert J.
Lally, Secretary, Maryland Department of Public Safety and
Correctional Services; Defendants Whose Names Are Unknown
At This Time: Correctional Officers and Classification
Officer, Maryland Penitentiary, Defendants, all of whom are
sued individually and in their official capacities, Defendants.

Nos. 86-7289.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 12, 1987.
Decided: Feb. 24, 1988.

Joseph Williams, Jr., appellant pro se.

Mark Disbrow McCurdy, Richard M. Kastendieck, Office of the Attorney General, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Williams, a Maryland inmate, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 complaint. As Williams failed to file objections to the magistrate's findings and recommendation upon proper notice, we find that he has waived appellate review of the decision below. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir.1985).

We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
United States v. Nwabuzor (Pauline)
841 F.2d 1123 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
841 F.2d 1123, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2148, 1988 WL 16911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/case-of-montgomery-ca4-1988.