Case of Jones

1 Armstrong. Election Cases 456
CourtNew York State Assembly
DecidedJanuary 4, 1870
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Armstrong. Election Cases 456 (Case of Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York State Assembly primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Case of Jones, 1 Armstrong. Election Cases 456 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1870).

Opinion

Report oe Committee.

Assembly Chamber, April %Qth, 1870.

Mr. Kelson, from the committee on privileges and elections, to which was referred the petition of W. W. Goodrich, claiming the seat now occupied by Hon. Wm. C. Jones, reported in writing and adversely thereto, as follows :

Papers and Testimony in the matter oe the Contested Election between William W. Goodrich and William C. Jones, in the Fifth Assembly District, Kings County.

To the House of Assembly of the State of New York :

The committee on privileges and elections, to which was referred -the petition of Wm. W. Goodrich, claiming the seat now occupied [457]*457by ¥m. 0. Jones, as representative from the fifth Assembly district of Kings county, respectfully report that the committee have heard the proofs and allegations of the respective claimants, and the arguments of counsel, and the facts of the case, as agreed npon, are as follows:

The whole number of votes cast in the fifthiAssembly. district was 5,338.

Of which number the Hon. ¥m. C. Jones received.:.. 2? 674

And the Hon. ¥m. W. Goodrich received .. 2,664

Giving a majority to the Hon. ¥m. 0. Jones of. 10 as 'declared by the board of county canvassers.

It is claimed on the part of Mr. Goodrich, that to make up the apparent majority of ten allowed to, Mr. Jones by the county canvassers, there were frauds committed in 'the third election district of the twentieth ward, by which the contestant lost thirty-four votes, he having been allowed but one hundred and fifty votes by the inspectors of election in that district, and having since obtained the affidavits of one hundred and eighty-four voters in said district, who testify that they cast their ballots for the contestant.

That upon a careful and thorough examination of the affidavits in the case, your committee have come to the conclusion’that a1 large portion of the affidavits upon which Mr. Goodrich rests his claim are entirely unreliable, and should not be admitted as evidence. Your committee append the names of the persons making- affidavits not sufficiently explicit to be relied on.

1. Charles Hall don’t recollect for whom he voted for Prison Inspector, judges, Comptroller or Secretary of State, or mayor ; and recollects his vote on Assembly only, because of a gentleman coming to his house and asking him to sign an affidavit.

2. J. B. Bogart voted the regular ticket; voted for Governor (no Governor elected last fall).

3. "William G. Williams don’t know whom he voted for, for any State officer or for mayor.

4.' Warrington B. Williams don’t know whom he voted for, for any State officer, for Governor, for Lieutenant-Governor, for supervisor, for corporation' counsel, or whether he voted for the Governor’s counsel.”

5. William Hunter don’t know for whom he-voted, for any of the State or other offices.

[458]*4586. Cassius Hunter is as positive tliat he voted for Governor as he is that he voted for Goodrich.

7. Nicholas Bennett stated first that he voted for 'William 0. Goodrich, and did not notice any resemblance between the Assembly tickets.

8. John Bennett dojn’t recollect particularly whether he voted on female suffrage, or for whom, lie voted for Prison Inspector, State Treasurer, Comptroller, street commissioner, or whether he voted for them or the mayor or aldermen.

9. Nelson Bowland is clear that he voted for female suffrage as that he voted for Goodrich.

10. James Hand don’t know whether he voted on female suffrage, or for any State officer, or for Comptroller, or street commissioner, and can’t name any other man than Goodrich on his ticket.

11. James Osborn voted for female suffrage, and don’t know one name on his ticket save Goodrich.

12. G. P. Gratacap can’t swear positively that he voted for Goodrich.

13. Charles P. Young is positive that he voted for Goodrich, but has no recollection of the indorsement.

14. John S. Young don’t recollect.voting for anybody hut Horace Greeley; don’t recollect the indorsement of Assembly ticket, nor whether the ticket contained more than one name.

15. W. B. Marsh swearssthere were three or four names on the ballot for Assembly.

16. A. F. Warren don’t know as he looked at his ticket, or if Horace Greeley’s name was on it, or whether he voted for female suffrage.

1J. John Olsen does not know whether there was more than one name on Goodrich’s ticket, or not, and cannot state whether he ran on the State ticket, and though he remembers seeing the name before he voted, did not examine any .tickets at the poll.

18. J. S. Gildersleve, did not have his attention particularly called to the Assembly ticket, and only knows it as on the republican series.

19. John A. Bennett declared plumply that he voted for Jones.

20. Arthur W. Foot examined his ticket very particularly with regard to that one vote, hut “voted for Governor,” and could not swear how he voted for any one other officer than Assemblyman.

21. Oliver Oleson opened all his tickets, and voted for Governor, [459]*459for both alderman and supervisor, and “ to .tbe best- of bis recollection ¥m, W. Goodrich was in Goodrich’s ticket. .

22. Jos. Fletcher would not say that he read his tickets before he voted.

23. Stephen Haviland can’t tell the name of the man he voted for for Assembly, but knows the name of Goodrich was among the tickets he voted.

24. Thomas W. Shaffer thinks his Assembly ticket may have been indorsed, “ For City Officers.”

25. Ambrose H. Fletcher, from seeing his ticket, could no swear what was in it.

26. James Shannon could not remember any vote but the one for Assembly.

27. Charles Olson declared his Assembly ticket was indorsed- “ State.”

28. Michael Bates don’t remember anything about the election except that he voted for Mr. Goodrich.

29. Edwin T. ITiscox did not examine his ballots.

30. 'Timothy Connor did not open his tickets.

31. Henry Strickland did not open his tickets.

32. David Pringle did not open his tickets.

33. Isaac Shepard voted, as far as he recollects,” for Goodrich.

34. Theodore B. Collyer could not tell from whom he received his tickets; .received them from a number of people; received both republican and democratic tickets.

35. Edward McWood thinks he voted for Goodrich ; don’t recollect his first name ; knew he voted for mayor.

36. Richard William can’t tell a single officer for whom, he voted; thinks that he voted for alderman (none running).

37. William Parsons voted for'register (none running); may have voted for female suffrage.

38. Alexander McDonald can’t say that he looked at more than one ticket.

39'. John McMalty did not look at the ticket he voted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Armstrong. Election Cases 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/case-of-jones-nystateassembly-1870.