Casciaro v. Combs

District Court, N.D. Illinois·Decided March 16, 2020·No. 3:17-cv-50094·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION Mario Casciaro, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 17 C 50094 Vv. ) ) Judge Philip G. Reinhard Keith Von Allmen et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER This matter comes before the court on the Order, Report and Recommendations (“R & R”) [163] of Magistrate Judge Johnston recommending that defendants’ motion to dismiss state law claims against defendant Rydberg and all claims against the unknown officers be granted. The court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. See FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. /d. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). In this case, the court has received no objections to the R & R (see [163], showing that objections were due by March 13, 2020). The court has reviewed the record in this case and finds that the February 28, 2020, R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the court adopts in its entirety Judge Johnston’s R & R. State law claims against defendant Rydberg and all claims against the unknown officers are dismissed.

Date: 3/16/2020 ENTER:

United States District Court Judge

Electronic Notices. (LC)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casciaro v. Combs, (N.D. Ill. 2020).

Casciaro v. Combs (Casciaro v. Combs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.