Casci v. State

307 So. 2d 446
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 8, 1975·No. No. 45701·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Zarsky v. State of Florida et al., 300 So.2d 261 (Fla.1974); Abraham v. State of Florida et al., 301 So.2d 11 (Fla.1974); Thornhill v. Kirkman, 62 So. 2d 740 (Fla.1959); City of Miami v. Aronovitz, 114 So.2d 784 (Fla.1959); Smith v. City of Gainesville, 93 So.2d 105 (Fla.1957).

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and OVERTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casci v. State, 307 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 1975).

307 So. 2d 446 (Casci v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Miami v. Aronovitz
114 So. 2d 784 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
Thornhill v. Kirkman
62 So. 2d 740 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)
Abraham v. State
301 So. 2d 11 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Zarsky v. State
300 So. 2d 261 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Smith v. City of Gainesville
93 So. 2d 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)