Cascadia Wildlands v. Adcock

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

CASCADIA WILDLANDS, an Oregon Civ. No. 6:22-cv-1344-MK nonprofit corporation; and OREGON WILD, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, ORDER

Plaintiffs, v.

CHERYL ADOCK, in her official capacity as Field Manager for the Siuslaw Field Office; and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT,

Defendants. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (#19), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, the Court reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). The Court finds no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (#19) is adopted. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (#10) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this24th of May, 2023. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge

1 – ORDER