Cascade Holding Corp. v. Peter Barmann Brewing Co.

246 A.D. 883
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 246 A.D. 883 (Cascade Holding Corp. v. Peter Barmann Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cascade Holding Corp. v. Peter Barmann Brewing Co., 246 A.D. 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Defendants, the trustees in bankruptcy of Peter Barmann Brewing Company, Inc., have appealed from an order denying their motion to set aside a judgment of foreclosure and for leave to interpose an answer. The proof shows the defendants were granted permission by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene and answer and that plaintiff’s counsel consented to the making of such an order. Counsel for the defendants notified plaintiff’s counsel that he did not intend to interpose an answer. He was given ample opportunity to do so if he so desired. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present —■ Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slote v. Cascade Holding Corp.
249 A.D. 332 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cascade-holding-corp-v-peter-barmann-brewing-co-nyappdiv-1936.