Cascade Forest Products, Inc. v. Accident Prevention Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Cascade Forest Products, Inc. v. Accident Prevention Division

665 P.2d 1258, 63 Or. App. 754, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3037

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 6, 1983

DocketSH-79-276; CA A23643

StatusPublished

This text of 665 P.2d 1258 (Cascade Forest Products, Inc. v. Accident Prevention Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cascade Forest Products, Inc. v. Accident Prevention Division, 665 P.2d 1258, 63 Or. App. 754, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3037 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

GILLETTE, P. J.

Petitioner, the prevailing party in Cascade Forest Products v. Accident Prev. Div., 60 Or App 255, 653 P2d 574 (1982), seeks an award of an attorney fee pursuant to the Oregon Administrative Procedures Act (APA). We decline to award a fee.

In our original opinion in this case, we reversed in part a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board referee that had upheld citations issued to petitioner by the Accident Prevention Division (APD) for violations of certain safety regulations. Our reversal was based on the fact that the referee had failed to make certain necessary findings in connection with the validity of the two citations. 60 Or App at 260-61. However, there was no suggestion in our opinion of any lack of substantial evidence to make the necessary findings on remand.

Under such circumstances, no award of attorney fees under ORS 183.495 — the statute on which petitioner relies— appears appropriate. Davidson v. Employment Division, 63 Or App 600, 666 P2d 261 (1983) (63 Or App at 605); see Van Gordon v. Ore. State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 63 Or App 561, 666 P2d 276 (1983) (63 Or App at 567).

Petition for attorney fee denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GILLETTE, P. J.

Petitioner, the prevailing party in Cascade Forest Products v. Accident Prev. Div., 60 Or App 255, 653 P2d 574 (1982), seeks an award of an attorney fee pursuant to the Oregon Administrative Procedures Act (APA). We decline to award a fee.

In our original opinion in this case, we reversed in part a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board referee that had upheld citations issued to petitioner by the Accident Prevention Division (APD) for violations of certain safety regulations. Our reversal was based on the fact that the referee had failed to make certain necessary findings in connection with the validity of the two citations. 60 Or App at 260-61. However, there was no suggestion in our opinion of any lack of substantial evidence to make the necessary findings on remand.

Under such circumstances, no award of attorney fees under ORS 183.495 — the statute on which petitioner relies— appears appropriate. Davidson v. Employment Division, 63 Or App 600, 666 P2d 261 (1983) (63 Or App at 605); see Van Gordon v. Ore. State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 63 Or App 561, 666 P2d 276 (1983) (63 Or App at 567).

Petition for attorney fee denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

665 P.2d 1258, 63 Or. App. 754, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cascade-forest-products-inc-v-accident-prevention-division-orctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack