Cascade Development Co., Inc. v. The United States
This text of 838 F.2d 1222 (Cascade Development Co., Inc. v. The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
838 F.2d 1222
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
CASCADE DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-1518.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Jan. 15, 1988.
Before NIES, Circuit Judge, NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge, and MAYER, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Claims Court, 12 Cl.Ct. 587 (1987) (Tidwell, J.), is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
In the oral argument of this case the government, as appellee, while denying it had taken plaintiff's property, conceded that if a taking occurred at all it occurred less than 6 years before the action was brought. This latter is also appellant's position. We think such a concession is warranted, if not required by the facts, and it better suits the interests of the parties. Accordingly, a judgment based on the statute of limitations cannot stand.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
838 F.2d 1222, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 370, 1988 WL 1390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cascade-development-co-inc-v-the-united-states-cafc-1988.