Cascade Automatic Sprinkler Corp. v. State
248 A.D. 795
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cascade Automatic Sprinkler Corp. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 247 A.D. 226 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1936·No. Claim No. 22060·Published
Opinion
— Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ. [See 247 App. Div. 226; post, 922.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cascade Automatic Sprinkler Corp. v. State, 248 A.D. 795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
248 A.D. 795 (Cascade Automatic Sprinkler Corp. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cascade Automatic Sprinkler Corp. v. State
247 A.D. 226 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)