Casavalo v. D'Auria
174 A. 506, 113 N.J.L. 328, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 365
Opinion
Tlio judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Deae, Wells, JJ. 8.
For reversal — Peesiiie, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Casavalo v. D'Auria, 174 A. 506, 113 N.J.L. 328, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 365 (N.J. 1934).
174 A. 506 (Casavalo v. D'Auria) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cafone v. Nesto Const. Co.
115 A.2d 148 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Welsh v. Bd. of Ed. of Tewksbury Tp.
72 A.2d 350 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)