Casas v. Marcos

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Casas v. Marcos

827 So. 2d 1022, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12773, 2002 WL 2007992

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 4, 2002

DocketNos. 3D99-1659, 3D99-1657

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 827 So. 2d 1022 (Casas v. Marcos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casas v. Marcos, 827 So. 2d 1022, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12773, 2002 WL 2007992 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, Rosa Casas, Jorge Luis Casas, and Luis Casas, appeal from a final judgment, and the defendants, Jose R. Marcos, Andres Carrera, and Cast Mar, Inc., cross-appeal from an adverse final judgment awarding attorney’s fees and costs. We affirm, in part, and reverse, in part.

The plaintiffs and defendants have raised multiple issues on appeal. We find that none merit discussion, and therefore, we affirm. However, the defendants have properly conceded that the trial court erred in calculating the collateral source set-off as to Jorge Luis Casas, and that the final judgment as to Jorge should reflect an award of $4,692.36. See § 627.7372, Fla. Stat. (1991). Therefore, we affirm, in part, and reverse, in part.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, Rosa Casas, Jorge Luis Casas, and Luis Casas, appeal from a final judgment, and the defendants, Jose R. Marcos, Andres Carrera, and Cast Mar, Inc., cross-appeal from an adverse final judgment awarding attorney’s fees and costs. We affirm, in part, and reverse, in part.

The plaintiffs and defendants have raised multiple issues on appeal. We find that none merit discussion, and therefore, we affirm. However, the defendants have properly conceded that the trial court erred in calculating the collateral source set-off as to Jorge Luis Casas, and that the final judgment as to Jorge should reflect an award of $4,692.36. See § 627.7372, Fla. Stat. (1991). Therefore, we affirm, in part, and reverse, in part.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

827 So. 2d 1022, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12773, 2002 WL 2007992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casas-v-marcos-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack