Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Casar v. State

Casar v. State

163 So. 3d 1239, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7272, 2015 WL 2259407
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 2015
DocketNo. 5D14-1302
StatusPublished

This text of 163 So. 3d 1239 (Casar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Casar v. State, 163 So. 3d 1239, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7272, 2015 WL 2259407 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State properly concedes that one of Casar’s two convictions for aggravated assault with a firearm is required to be vacated on double jeopardy grounds. See Estremera v. State, 107 So.3d 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (concluding that all elements of crime of aggravated assault with firearm are contained within crime of burglary with assault while armed with firearm; therefore, convictions for both violate prohibition against double jeopardy); see also McGhee v. State, 133 So.3d 1137, 1138 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014). Casar’s convictions and sentences are otherwise affirmed.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.

EVANDER, COHEN and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estremera v. State
107 So. 3d 511 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
McGhee v. State
133 So. 3d 1137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 So. 3d 1239, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7272, 2015 WL 2259407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casar-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.