Casanova v. Morales

262 F. App'x 164
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 10, 2008
DocketNo. 07-14145
StatusPublished

This text of 262 F. App'x 164 (Casanova v. Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Casanova v. Morales, 262 F. App'x 164 (11th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We find no error in the District Court’s determination that Carlos Casanova has failed to establish coverage under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-216, and thus, the Summary Judgment in favor of Jorge Luis Morales is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 201-216
29 U.S.C. § 201-216
§ 201
29 U.S.C. § 201

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 F. App'x 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casanova-v-morales-ca11-2008.