Casanova v. Gooch

214 So. 2d 597, 1968 Miss. LEXIS 1318
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 30, 1968
DocketNo. 44952
StatusPublished

This text of 214 So. 2d 597 (Casanova v. Gooch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Casanova v. Gooch, 214 So. 2d 597, 1968 Miss. LEXIS 1318 (Mich. 1968).

Opinion

ROBERTSON, Justice:

The appellants, Mrs. Corinne Wiggins Casanova, Burch Williams, and others, brought suit against Mrs. Mary Gooch and others in the Chancery Court of the Second Judicial District of Bolivar County, Mississippi, to correct an ambiguity in a final decree of partition, and to declare the appellants the owners of the North 130 feet of Lot 11 of Block 3 of the Original Town of Cleveland, Mississippi. After a full trial, the chancellor dismissed the [598]*598original and amended bills of complaint, and the appellants appeal from that decision.

This Court held in Williams v. Gooch, 208 Miss. 223, 44 So.2d 57 (1950), that O. P. Gooch inherited from Corinne Smith Gooch, his deceased wife, 50 per cent of her real estate in fee simple, and a life estate in the other 50 per cent with remainder in Corinne Smith Wiggins (now Casanova) and Burch Williams.

Promptly thereafter, O. P. Gooch filed a bill for partition of the entire real estate left by his deceased wife, Corinne S. Gooch. Gooch prayed that all of the real estate of Corinne S. Gooch be divided into two equal parts, that one part be set aside to him in fee simple, and that he be declared to be the owner of a life estate in the other part with remainder over to Corinne Smith Wiggins and Burch Williams.

The interlocutory decree appointing three commissioners and directing them to divide the entire real estate of Corinne S. Gooch into two equal shares, described in detail the extensive holdings to be partited, including the following:

“(a) the north 130 feet of Lot Eleven (11) of Block Three (3) on which is located a warehouse constructed of corrugated iron and a double garage constructed of lumber. * * * ”

The interlocutory decree directed the commissioners to

“go upon and view said real estate and either with or without the aid of a Surveyor as they may deem necessary, divide said real estate into two parts or shares, such parts or shares to be of equal value”

and assign one part to O. P. Gooch in fee simple and the other part to O. P. Gooch for life with the remainder estate to be owned by Corinne Smith Wiggins and Burch Williams as equal joint tenants with the right of survivorship.

The commissioners employed W. M. Thomas, a civil engineer, to survey the property, furnishing him a list of the many properties to be surveyed and partited, which list included the North 130 feet of Lot 11 of Block 3. Thomas made the survey and returned the list and a plat of the survey to the commissioners. The commissioners then gave the surveyor a list designating which parcels were to be allocated to Share Number 1 and Share Number 2. On June 23, 1950, the surveyor filed in the partition proceeding a Surveyor’s Certificate of Partition of Real Estate, in which the surveyor stated, among other things, the following:

“The undersigned when making the survey of said real estate determined that the warehouse constructed of corrugated iron and the double garage described in subdivision (a) aforesaid was not located on the north 130 feet of Lot 11 of Block 3 of said Original Town of Cleveland, Mississippi, but was located on portions of Lots 12, 13 and 14 of said Block 3 of the Original Town of Cleveland, Mississippi, and that said portions of Lots 12, 13 and 14 of said Block 3 on which said warehouse and double garage are located are included in other descriptions of said real estate subject to partition mentioned aforesaid and that said portions of Lot 11 of Block 3 ought to be eliminated from said survey.”

The surveyor’s certificate went on to state:

“The undersigned further certifies that he and said chain-bearers at the request and under the directions and in the presence of said Commissioners divided said entire described real estate into two parts or shares, and numbered them One and Two respectively. * * * ”

The surveyor’s certificate further stated:

“The undersigned W. M. Thomas further states that said entire tract as well as the division thereof into two parts or [599]*599shares is represented by a plat of survey made by him from said survey of said real estate and which plat has been signed by him which plat is a true and correct plat, and has been delivered to the Commissioners appointed to make said partition to be exhibited to the Court with their Report.”

The Report of Commissioners Making Partition was filed on the same day as the surveyor’s certificate. The Report contained a description of the North 130 feet of Lot 11 of Block 3 as being a part of the property to be partited, and contained also an exact rescript of the surveyor’s statement with reference to the warehouse and double garage not being on the North 130 feet of Lot 11, but being on portions of Lots 12, 13 and 14 of Block 3.

The Report goes on to say that the commissioners had divided and partited the said real estate into two parts or shares approximately equal in value. The Report then assigned Share Number 1 to O. P. Gooch in fee simple and Share Number 2 to O. P. Gooch for life with remainder to Corinne Smith Wiggins and Burch Williams.

The Report further stated:

“Your Commissioners caused a plat of said real estate to be made by said W. M. Thomas, Civil Engineer and Surveyor, with true field notes, specifying the courses, distances and boundary lines of said real estate and of the lines of the buildings located thereon, where there are buildings thereon, and of the several parts or shares thereof, which plat is attached hereto as Exhibit ‘A’ and is made a part of this Report as fully and completely as if copied herein in words and figures.”

The Final Decree Approving Partition of Real Estate, rendered on July 1, 1950, ordered, adjudged, and decreed:

“1. That the real estate which the Court directed by said decree [of May 27, 1950] to be divided is described as situated in the City of Cleveland in the Second Judicial District, Bolivar County, Mississippi, to-wit:
* * * * * * '
“(a) The north 130 feet of Lot Eleven (11) of Block Three (3) on which is located a warehouse constructed of corrugated iron and a double garage constructed of lumber;
* * * * * *
“4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Gooch
44 So. 2d 57 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 So. 2d 597, 1968 Miss. LEXIS 1318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casanova-v-gooch-miss-1968.