Casalbore v. McGuire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Casalbore v. McGuire

87 A.D.2d 553, 448 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15793

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.D.2d 553 (Casalbore v. McGuire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casalbore v. McGuire, 87 A.D.2d 553, 448 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Evens, J.) entered November 20, 1980, [554]*554which granted petition in a CPLR article 78 proceeding to the extent of staying the removal of petitioner police officer from sick-leave status and his assignment to limited-duty status until such time as a qualified orthopedic specialist considered him physically able to work and granting an immediate trial on the issue of petitioner’s ability to perform limited or full-duty work, reversed, on the law, without costs, and the petition is dismissed. In assigning petitioner to limited-duty status, and removing him from sick-leave status, respondents acted in justifiable reliance on qualified medical opinions. We do not agree with Special Term’s implicit view that the action taken was arbitrary or that an issue of fact was presented that required a trial. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Lupiano, Bloom and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Evens, J.) entered November 20, 1980, [554]*554which granted petition in a CPLR article 78 proceeding to the extent of staying the removal of petitioner police officer from sick-leave status and his assignment to limited-duty status until such time as a qualified orthopedic specialist considered him physically able to work and granting an immediate trial on the issue of petitioner’s ability to perform limited or full-duty work, reversed, on the law, without costs, and the petition is dismissed. In assigning petitioner to limited-duty status, and removing him from sick-leave status, respondents acted in justifiable reliance on qualified medical opinions. We do not agree with Special Term’s implicit view that the action taken was arbitrary or that an issue of fact was presented that required a trial. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Lupiano, Bloom and Milonas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 553, 448 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casalbore-v-mcguire-nyappdiv-1982.