Casady v. Bosler

11 Iowa 242
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedDecember 6, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 11 Iowa 242 (Casady v. Bosler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Casady v. Bosler, 11 Iowa 242 (iowa 1860).

Opinion

Wright, J.

I. Complainants appeal from the order of the District Court dissolving an injunction obtained by them to stay the sale of certain real estate under a trust deed. The action of the court was warranted by the following cases: Stringham v. Brown, 7 Iowa 33; Sloan v. Coolbaugh, 10 Ib. 31; Johnson, v. Triggs, 4 G. Greene, 99; Freeman v. Fleming, 5 Ib. 461, and Mohn v. Stoner, ante. And see Story on Cont. section 635; 5 Johns. Ch. 122; 18 Conn. 18; Story’s Eq. Jur. section 301 and note 1.

II. An offer to pay a particular sum of money, without producing the same, as provided for in section 1816, Rev. of 1860, must be in writing. If not in writing, the necessity, as a general rule, for such production is not dispensed with.

III. As to when this court will interfere with the discretion exercised by the court below, in dissolving or continuing. [245]*245an injunction, see Shricker v. Field, 9 Iowa, 366.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Myrah v. Dana
202 N.W. 748 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1925)
Traer v. Lucas Prospecting Co.
99 N.W. 290 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1904)
Goldfrank, Frank & Co. v. Young
64 Tex. 432 (Texas Supreme Court, 1885)
Shugart & Lininger v. Pattee
37 Iowa 422 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Iowa 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casady-v-bosler-iowa-1860.