Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Casado v. State

Casado v. State

874 So. 2d 726, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8091, 2004 WL 1252743
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 2004
DocketNo. 3D03-7
StatusPublished

This text of 874 So. 2d 726 (Casado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Casado v. State, 874 So. 2d 726, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8091, 2004 WL 1252743 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the state’s proper confession of error we reverse the sentence imposed and remand for resentencing as the trial court violated Rule 3.720(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.1 On remand the trial court shall afford Casado the benefits of the rule. The defendant, of course, shall be present at resentencing.

We reject Casado’s self-defense or defense of others contention. See State v. James, 867 So.2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

[727]*727Casado’s sentence is reversed and remanded. The cause is otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. James
867 So. 2d 414 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
874 So. 2d 726, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8091, 2004 WL 1252743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casado-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.