Casado v. State

874 So. 2d 726, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8091, 2004 WL 1252743
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 2004·No. No. 3D03-7·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the state’s proper confession of error we reverse the sentence imposed and remand for resentencing as the trial court violated Rule 3.720(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.1 On remand the trial court shall afford Casado the benefits of the rule. The defendant, of course, shall be present at resentencing.

We reject Casado’s self-defense or defense of others contention. See State v. James, 867 So.2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

[727] Casado’s sentence is reversed and remanded. The cause is otherwise affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casado v. State, 874 So. 2d 726, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8091, 2004 WL 1252743 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

874 So. 2d 726 (Casado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. James
867 So. 2d 414 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)