Casado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Casado v. State

674 So. 2d 217, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6313, 1996 WL 313040

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Casado v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3713 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 1996·No. No. 95-3143·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the defendant’s six-year sentence for tampering with a State’s witness and remand with directions to resentence defendant on that count to a sentence not to exceed five years. See §§ 914.22; 775.082(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (1993)(tampering with a witness constitutes a third-degree felony, punishable by a term of imprisonment not exceeding five years).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the defendant’s six-year sentence for tampering with a State’s witness and remand with directions to resentence defendant on that count to a sentence not to exceed five years. See §§ 914.22; 775.082(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (1993)(tampering with a witness constitutes a third-degree felony, punishable by a term of imprisonment not exceeding five years).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Casado v. State, 674 So. 2d 217, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6313, 1996 WL 313040 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

674 So. 2d 217 (Casado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.