Casado v. Casado

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Casado v. Casado

487 So. 2d 350, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 830, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7214

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 8, 1986

DocketNo. 85-2293

StatusPublished

This text of 487 So. 2d 350 (Casado v. Casado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casado v. Casado, 487 So. 2d 350, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 830, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7214 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a dissolution of marriage the trial court awarded custody of four minor children to the father and exclusive possession of the marital home to him for a two-year period. After the two-year period it was to be sold and the proceeds divided. We find this to be error and strike the two-year limitation and amend said final dissolution by permitting the father to retain possession of the marital home until the youngest child reaches majority or he is relieved of the responsibility of custody. Cabrera v. Cabrera, 484 So.2d 1338 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) revised opinion filed March 11, 1986, 11 FLW 621, and cases cited therein.

The other alleged error in the provisions of the final judgment is found to be without merit. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Farrington v. Farrington, 390 So.2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Price v. Price, 389 So.2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

The final judgment under review is affirmed as modified by this opinion.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a dissolution of marriage the trial court awarded custody of four minor children to the father and exclusive possession of the marital home to him for a two-year period. After the two-year period it was to be sold and the proceeds divided. We find this to be error and strike the two-year limitation and amend said final dissolution by permitting the father to retain possession of the marital home until the youngest child reaches majority or he is relieved of the responsibility of custody. Cabrera v. Cabrera, 484 So.2d 1338 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) revised opinion filed March 11, 1986, 11 FLW 621, and cases cited therein.

The other alleged error in the provisions of the final judgment is found to be without merit. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Farrington v. Farrington, 390 So.2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Price v. Price, 389 So.2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

The final judgment under review is affirmed as modified by this opinion.

Affirmed as modified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

487 So. 2d 350, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 830, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casado-v-casado-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack