Casackkar v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Casackkar v. Division of Employment Security

398 S.W.3d 931, 2013 WL 2221469, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 601

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 21, 2013·No. No. ED 98119·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Casackkar appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him unemployment benefits on the grounds that he was discharged for misconduct. We find the Commission did not err in finding Casack-kar was disqualified from receiving benefits due to misconduct. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Casackkar appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him unemployment benefits on the grounds that he was discharged for misconduct. We find the Commission did not err in finding Casack-kar was disqualified from receiving benefits due to misconduct. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Casackkar v. Division of Employment Security, 398 S.W.3d 931, 2013 WL 2221469, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 601 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

398 S.W.3d 931 (Casackkar v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.