Carzell Moore v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center

738 F.2d 1126, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20280
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carzell Moore v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center. Read the opinion of the Court — 722 F.2d 640
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 23, 1984·No. 82-8683·Published

Opinion

738 F.2d 1126

Carzell MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Walter D. ZANT, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and
Classification Center, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 82-8683.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

July 23, 1984.

Robert E. Morin, Stephen B. Bright, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.

Susan Boleyn, William B. Hill, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

Case below: 722 F.2d 640.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia.

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

The court en banc holds this case in abeyance for a period of 60 days in order that petitioner may present to the courts of the State of Georgia claims he may have arising out of Stynchcombe v. Floyd, 252 Ga. 113, 311 S.E.2d 828 (1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carzell Moore v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, 738 F.2d 1126, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20280 (11th Cir. 1984).

738 F.2d 1126 (Carzell Moore v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stynchcombe v. Floyd
311 S.E.2d 828 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1984)