Caryn Lee Stucky v. State

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _____________________ _____

09-17-00379-CR __________________________

Caryn Lee Stucky, Appellant V. The State of Texas, Appellee

_________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 221st District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 17-01-00333-CR _________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief

concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel certified that counsel provided copies of the

motion and brief to Appellant, advised Appellant of Appellant’s right to examine

the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied Appellant with a form

motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d

313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant requested access to the appellate record with this Court. We

hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide access to a paper copy of the

reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification

to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on

or before Monday, March 26, 2018. See id., 436 S.W.3d at 321-22.

ORDER ENTERED March 8, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.