Caryn Lee Stucky v. State
This text of Caryn Lee Stucky v. State (Caryn Lee Stucky v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _____________________ _____
09-17-00379-CR __________________________
Caryn Lee Stucky, Appellant V. The State of Texas, Appellee
_________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 221st District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 17-01-00333-CR _________________________________________________________________
ORDER
Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief
concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel certified that counsel provided copies of the
motion and brief to Appellant, advised Appellant of Appellant’s right to examine
the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied Appellant with a form
motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d
313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant requested access to the appellate record with this Court. We
hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide access to a paper copy of the
reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification
to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on
or before Monday, March 26, 2018. See id., 436 S.W.3d at 321-22.
ORDER ENTERED March 8, 2018.
PER CURIAM
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Caryn Lee Stucky v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caryn-lee-stucky-v-state-texapp-2018.