Cary v. Rosenblatt

180 F. App'x 447
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 18, 2006·No. No. 05-7362·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerry L. Cary, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cary v. Rosenblatt, No. CA-05-456-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 23, 2005). We deny Cary’s motions for appointment of counsel, to amend the caption, and to amend his claim. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cary v. Rosenblatt, 180 F. App'x 447 (4th Cir. 2006).

180 F. App'x 447 (Cary v. Rosenblatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related