Cary v. Cary

144 A.D. 846, 129 N.Y.S. 444, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4255
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 3, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 144 A.D. 846 (Cary v. Cary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cary v. Cary, 144 A.D. 846, 129 N.Y.S. 444, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4255 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Smith, P. J.:

The interlocutory judgment herein was entered upon July ■28, 1909. The final judgment was made November 6, 1909,. and entered November 28,-1909. • In August of the same year, and before the final judgment of divorce had been made and entered, the plaintiff took the defendant to his home and there [847]*847lived and cohabited with her as husband and wife, and continued that relation after the final judgment was entered, and until March of the succeeding year. ' By section 1758 of the Code of Civil Procedure a divorce should be denied, although the adultery be proven, “Where the offense charged has been forgiven by the plaintiff,” which fact may be proven by the voluntary cohabitation of the parties with the knowledge of the fact. By section 1774 a party is entitled, as of course, to a final judgment three months after the entry of the interlocutory judgment, “unless for sufficient cause the court in the meantime shall have otherwise ordered.” If the- fact of the voluntary cohabitation had been known to the court at the time of. the entry of the final judgment, the final judgment would undoubtedly have been denied. The fact that it was concealed from the court at that time gives full warrant to the court, upon the discovery of this fact after the entry of final judgment, to vacate and set aside the same. The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concurred. .

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawson v. Lawson
174 N.W.2d 202 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1970)
Baranowitz v. Baranowitz
13 Misc. 2d 404 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Linn v. Linn
69 N.W.2d 147 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1955)
Shinn v. Shinn
29 N.W.2d 629 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1947)
Burgher v. Burgher
184 Misc. 682 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)
Sutin v. Sutin
180 Misc. 197 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1942)
Gysin v. Gysin
239 A.D. 855 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)
Lane v. Superior Court
285 P. 860 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)
Walton v. Walton
278 P. 780 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1929)
Kahn v. Kahn
126 Misc. 44 (New York Supreme Court, 1925)
State ex rel. Morris v. Superior Court
223 P. 583 (Washington Supreme Court, 1924)
Olson v. Superior Court
165 P. 706 (California Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 A.D. 846, 129 N.Y.S. 444, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cary-v-cary-nyappdiv-1911.