Cary, Bangs & Woodward v. Edmondson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cary, Bangs & Woodward v. Edmondson

44 Ga. 651

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1872

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 44 Ga. 651 (Cary, Bangs & Woodward v. Edmondson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cary, Bangs & Woodward v. Edmondson, 44 Ga. 651 (Ga. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

McCay, Judge.

This case turns upon the non-residence of the plaintiff. We have decided in several cases that notes held by nonresidents of this State, not used here, but only here for collection, are not taxable by our laws. The proof here is that at the making of the note, and continuously since, the plaintiff, to whom the note is payable, has not resided in this State. This the judgment, under these rulings, made, doubtless, since this decision by Judge Harrell, must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCay, Judge.

This case turns upon the non-residence of the plaintiff. We have decided in several cases that notes held by nonresidents of this State, not used here, but only here for collection, are not taxable by our laws. The proof here is that at the making of the note, and continuously since, the plaintiff, to whom the note is payable, has not resided in this State. This the judgment, under these rulings, made, doubtless, since this decision by Judge Harrell, must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 Ga. 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cary-bangs-woodward-v-edmondson-ga-1872.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack