Carwile v. Compton

Fourth Circuit

Carwile v. Compton

110 F. App'x 361

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 15, 2004

DocketNo. 04-7176

StatusPublished

This text of 110 F. App'x 361 (Carwile v. Compton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carwile v. Compton, 110 F. App'x 361 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dustin L. Carwile appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carwile v. Compton, No. CA-03-154-2 (E.D.Va. June 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Dustin L. Carwile appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carwile v. Compton, No. CA-03-154-2 (E.D.Va. June 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 F. App'x 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carwile-v-compton-ca4-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack