Carver v. State

425 S.E.2d 657, 262 Ga. 723, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 496, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 199
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 8, 1993
DocketS92A1492
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 425 S.E.2d 657 (Carver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carver v. State, 425 S.E.2d 657, 262 Ga. 723, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 496, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 199 (Ga. 1993).

Opinion

Hunstein, Justice.

The appellant was convicted of malice murder. He brings this appeal from the denial of his motion for new trial. 1

*724 Decided February 8, 1993. William K. Blackstone, for appellant. Glenn Thomas, Jr., District Attorney, John B. Johnson III, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Assistant Attorney General, C. A. Benjamin Woolf, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

1. The appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial inasmuch as the evidence did not support the verdict. It was established without dispute that on December 13, 1990, an argument ensued between the appellant and the victim (appellant’s brother) which resulted in the shooting of the victim by the appellant. There was evidence that the victim did not leave his seat behind a bolted-down table during the argument. There was also testimony that following the shooting the appellant stated: “Now [the victim] knows who the baddest Carver is.” The appellant’s defense was that he fired in self-defense after the victim threatened to kill him. Having reviewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, we conclude that it was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crime charged. See generally Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

2. The appellant complains of the trial court’s failure to give a requested instruction because the court’s charge failed to define forcible felony and did not adequately explain the “doctrine of reasonable beliefs.” The trial court extensively charged on justification and self-defense. It is not necessary to give the exact language of a request to charge when the applicable principles are fairly covered by the charge as given. Bruce v. State, 259 Ga. 798 (3) (b) (387 SE2d 886) (1990). We conclude that the charge when taken as a whole was adequate, and we consequently find this enumeration to be without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Clarke, C. J., Hunt, P. J., Benham, Fletcher and Sears-Collins, JJ., concur.
1

The crime occurred on December 13, 1990. The appellant was indicted on February 6, 1991. A jury found him guilty on December 10, 1991, and the appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment on that same day. Appellant’s motion for new trial, filed January 10, 1992, was *724 denied on July 6, 1992. The appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on July 14, 1992, and the appeal was docketed in this Court on September 1, 1992. The appeal was submitted for decision without oral argument on October 16, 1992.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dalton O. Christie v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2026
Morris v. State
303 Ga. 192 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
McCoy v. State
544 S.E.2d 709 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2001)
Christopher v. State
497 S.E.2d 803 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1998)
Beam v. State
463 S.E.2d 347 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1995)
Prayor v. State
456 S.E.2d 664 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
425 S.E.2d 657, 262 Ga. 723, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 496, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carver-v-state-ga-1993.