Carver v. Lehman

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carver v. Lehman. Read the opinion of the Court — 558 F.3d 869
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2008·No. 06-35176·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH CARVER,  Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 06-35176 v. JOSEPH LEHMAN; KIMBERLY ACKER;  D.C. No. CV-04-05570-RBL VICTORIA ROBERTS; SIX TO BE ORDER NAMED DEFENDANTS, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed August 26, 2008

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Richard C. Tallman, and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed on June 9, 2008 and appearing at 528 F.3d 659 is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit.

Plaintiff-Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and Defendants-Appellants’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc are DENIED as moot.

11669 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carver v. Lehman, (9th Cir. 2008).

Carver v. Lehman (Carver v. Lehman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carver v. Lehman
528 F.3d 659 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)