Carver v. Carver

542 So. 2d 468, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1097, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2339, 1989 WL 43806
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 4, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1775
StatusPublished

This text of 542 So. 2d 468 (Carver v. Carver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carver v. Carver, 542 So. 2d 468, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1097, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2339, 1989 WL 43806 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a marriage dissolution case. We find no error in the judgment which warrants reversal, save one. Although the awards to appellee were greater than those to appellant it cannot be said equitable distribution did not occur. See Canakaris v. Cana-karis, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). The one error involves the credit given to appellee for her payments to mortgagees. She is entitled legally to only fifty percent of the total payments made.

The judgment is affirmed in all respects except the credit on mortgage payments to be given appellee. The judgment on that point is reversed and this cause remanded for entry of an amended judgment.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

SHARP, C.J., and GOSHORN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
542 So. 2d 468, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1097, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2339, 1989 WL 43806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carver-v-carver-fladistctapp-1989.