Carver v. Bennett

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 25, 2009·No. 09-7637·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7637

TOMMY CARVER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOYD BENNETT; UTILIZATION REVIEW BOARD; DOCTOR CAMPBELL; ROBERT UHREN, M.D.; DAVID R. MITCHELL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00283-GCM)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 25, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tommy Carver, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tommy Carver appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Carver v. Bennett, No. 1:09-cv-00283-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug.

14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carver v. Bennett, (4th Cir. 2009).

Carver v. Bennett (Carver v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related