Carver Fed. Sav. Bank v. Campbell
This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 05485 (Carver Fed. Sav. Bank v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Carver Fed. Sav. Bank v Campbell |
| 2020 NY Slip Op 05485 |
| Decided on October 7, 2020 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on October 7, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.
2018-06261
(Index No. 504086/13)
v
Wilson L. Campbell, etc., et al., respondents, et al., defendants; Waterfall Victoria Grantor Trust II, Series G, nonparty-appellant.
Hahn & Hessen, LLP, New York, NY (Robert J. Malatak and Brigitte R. Rose of counsel), for nonparty-appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, nonparty Waterfall Victoria Grantor Trust II, Series G, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Noach Dear, J.), dated November 20, 2017. The order, in effect, denied those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendants Wilson L. Campbell and Judith Brown-Campbell, to strike those defendants' answer, and for an order of reference.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendants Wilson L. Campbell and Judith Brown-Campbell, to strike those defendants' answer, and for an order of reference are granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a determination of the remaining branches of the plaintiff's motion.
We reverse the order for reasons stated in US Bank N.A. v Bochicchio (179 AD3d 1133, 1135) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Heiney (168 AD3d 1126, 1127).
MASTRO, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 NY Slip Op 05485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carver-fed-sav-bank-v-campbell-nyappdiv-2020.