Caruthers v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Caruthers v. State

267 S.W. 713, 99 Tex. Crim. 25, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 789

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 3, 1924·No. No. 9030.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The appellants, Emma Caruthers, Mildred Ryan, and May McMillen, were convicted of misdemeanor theft, and each adjudged to pay a fine of fifty dollars and suffer confinement in the county jail for a period of fifteen days.

The appellants entered a plea of guitly. The record is before us without statement of facts or bill of exceptions. We have observed no irregularities in the procedure.

• The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The appellants, Emma Caruthers, Mildred Ryan, and May McMillen, were convicted of misdemeanor theft, and each adjudged to pay a fine of fifty dollars and suffer confinement in the county jail for a period of fifteen days.

The appellants entered a plea of guitly. The record is before us without statement of facts or bill of exceptions. We have observed no irregularities in the procedure.

• The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Caruthers v. State, 267 S.W. 713, 99 Tex. Crim. 25, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 789 (Tex. 1924).

Pincite

267 S.W. 713 (Caruthers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.