Caruthers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Caruthers v. State

204 S.W.3d 675, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1608, 2006 WL 3069494

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 31, 2006·No. No. ED 87234·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paul Caruthers appeals the judgment denying his motion under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 to vacate, set aside, or correct judgment or sentence. The court erroneously denied Caruthers’s amended motion for untimeliness. The court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law on the merits, however, are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our deci[676] sion. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paul Caruthers appeals the judgment denying his motion under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 to vacate, set aside, or correct judgment or sentence. The court erroneously denied Caruthers’s amended motion for untimeliness. The court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law on the merits, however, are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our deci[676] sion. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Caruthers v. State, 204 S.W.3d 675, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1608, 2006 WL 3069494 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

204 S.W.3d 675 (Caruthers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.