Caruso v. . Troy Gas Company
102 N.E. 1100, 209 N.Y. 510, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 854
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the evidence was sufficient to justify the finding of the jury that the defendant maintained a nuisance; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, Willard Bartlett, Chase, Ouddeback,' Hogan and Miller, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Oh. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caruso v. . Troy Gas Company, 102 N.E. 1100, 209 N.Y. 510, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 854 (N.Y. 1913).
102 N.E. 1100 (Caruso v. . Troy Gas Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haughton v. T & J Electrical Corp.
309 A.D.2d 1007 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Miner v. Long Island Lighting Co.
353 N.E.2d 805 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Miner v. Long Island Lighting Co.
47 A.D.2d 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Ward v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
264 A.D. 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Meehan v. Adirondack Electric Power Corp.
88 Misc. 235 (New York Supreme Court, 1914)
Bloss v. Oneida Railway Co.
162 A.D. 200 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)