Caruso v. Ridge Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Caruso v. Ridge Construction Corp.

252 A.D. 918, 300 N.Y.S. 795, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6802

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 5, 1937·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order so far as they relate to the first alleged cause of action reversed on the law and motion as to such cause of action denied and judgment and order otherwise affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The reversal as to the first cause of action is on the authority of Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co. (270 N. Y. 287), and on the ground that the complaint liberally construed alleges an injury not covered by the compensation provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. All concur. (The judgment and order dismiss the amended complaint in a silicosis action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order so far as they relate to the first alleged cause of action reversed on the law and motion as to such cause of action denied and judgment and order otherwise affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The reversal as to the first cause of action is on the authority of Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co. (270 N. Y. 287), and on the ground that the complaint liberally construed alleges an injury not covered by the compensation provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. All concur. (The judgment and order dismiss the amended complaint in a silicosis action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Caruso v. Ridge Construction Corp., 252 A.D. 918, 300 N.Y.S. 795, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

252 A.D. 918 (Caruso v. Ridge Construction Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related