Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Caruso v. International House of Pancakes

Caruso v. International House of Pancakes

228 A.D.2d 462, 643 N.Y.2d 1023, 643 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6595
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 10, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D.2d 462 (Caruso v. International House of Pancakes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caruso v. International House of Pancakes, 228 A.D.2d 462, 643 N.Y.2d 1023, 643 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6595 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Since the plaintiff failed to address the merits of his case in opposition to the defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b), the court erred as a matter of law by granting the motion conditionally (see, Kel Mgt. v Rogers & Wells, 64 NY2d 904, 905; Stolowitz v Mount Sinai Hosp., 60 NY2d 685; Rosano v County of Nassau, 208 AD2d 704, 705; Sanders v Van Dome Mgt., 191 AD2d 630). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stolowitz v. Mount Sinai Hospital
455 N.E.2d 1255 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Kel Management Corp. v. Rogers & Wells
477 N.E.2d 458 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Sanders v. Van Dome Management
191 A.D.2d 630 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Rosano v. County of Nassau
208 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 462, 643 N.Y.2d 1023, 643 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caruso-v-international-house-of-pancakes-nyappdiv-1996.