Caruso v. Harmon
290 S.W.3d 159, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1153, 2009 WL 2431468
Opinion
ORDER
Harold Eugene Harmon appeals from a judgment in favor of Deborah Caruso on her petition for damages for assault and battery. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the -reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caruso v. Harmon, 290 S.W.3d 159, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1153, 2009 WL 2431468 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
290 S.W.3d 159 (Caruso v. Harmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woodard v. SANCEGRAW
290 S.W.3d 159 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)